Update: Wordfence now Has an FAQ on Alleged Russian Hacking

They’ve laid out the critical data in a post titled Election Hack Report FAQ. This report includes clarifying that, despite their headline, they were not claiming that the report truly traced the hacking to Russia. I thought that was pretty clear in the first place, but I suppose “headline only” readers (not my favorite people), might get confused. In any case, the FAQ makes what they are and are not claiming clear.

Link to my previous note on this. Note that my headline is also not intended to imply that the link to the Russians was proven. I intended humor.

Similar Posts

  • From BarracudaMSP: 5 Security Tips

    I got these in the mail today, the day after Christmas, but they’re good for continuing visits, and they’re good year-round. Five Powerful Security Tips for Keeping Data Secure this Christmas

  • A Scam Email

    Several people have asked me very recently about scam emails. I don’t mind being asked, but there are some signs you should look at. I’m going to include a partial screenshot here. Here are several key signs: Lousy grammar. I’ve underlined a couple of items. Valid emails can have grammatical errors, but this sounds like…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.